|
|
| Home | Software Providers | Consultants | Articles | Columns | Reviews | Headlines |
 Copyright © 2003 Business
Insurance |
"Approach to Handling IT Exposures
Vary Widely"
December 1, 2003
|
- by: MICHAEL BRADFORD
When it comes to protecting their companies from cyber risks, most risk managers are
leaving the nitty gritty work to their information technology departments.
How involved risk managers become with IT varies. At some organizations, there is close
communication between the two departments, while at others, there is little. Much depends
on the corporate and risk management philosophies of the company.
But even at organizations where risk managers are on a first-name basis with their IT
colleagues, it likely is understood that the technology experts are the ones to identify
such risks as those posed by viruses, hackers or other threats to computer security.
In many cases, risk managers become advisers to IT departments, making sure those areas
are aware of the types of technology-related risks the organization faces and putting
together risk financing programs to cover the potential impact of computer security
breaches.
"Risk managers are focused on the overall risk," said Peter Foster, Boston-based
senior vp and co-leader of Marsh Inc.'s information risk advisory practice. IT
departments, in turn, are looking at putting up security firewalls, protecting networks
from intrusion and determining "what they are going to do in response" to a
security breach, he added.
Elizabeth Morrell, senior risk analyst with The Southern Co. in Atlanta, chairs the
technology advisory council of the Risk & Insurance Management Society Inc. She said
that in talking recently with risk managers regarding their role in protecting their
companies from hackers and viruses, the "almost universal" response was that
none has a relationship with their IT department in which they directly address that
exposure.
Ms. Morrell said her role at the Atlanta utility company has been to focus on the
organization's risk management information system, a responsibility that entailed taking
over some functions that previously were handled by the information technology department.
"With regard to risk management and its relationship to IT, it varies on an
individual organization basis," said Catherine Dowdall, risk and insurance manager
for the Ontario Lottery & Gaming Corp. in Sault Ste. Marie. "And it also varies
with the role of the risk manager and how proactive the risk manager is within that
organization."
Sandy Bragman, vp-risk management at Tenet Health Systems in Dallas and vp-technology on
RIMS' Executive Council, agreed. Within a company that takes an enterprise risk management
approach, a risk manager will have more IT involvement than will one at an organization
that approaches loss control in a more traditional way, he said.
A company's business can also influence the extent of interaction between risk management
and IT, according to Ms. Dowdall. A risk manager might be more directly involved in
higher-level IT matters at an e-commerce business, she said, while at another type of
operation, the risk manager's technology loss control efforts might focus more on computer
security problems posed by desktop computers, e-mail and other, more general threats.
"I see my role as making IT aware of the potential exposures to the organization and
bringing solutions to those exposures," Ms. Dowdall said.
"I am an expert in what I do, and they are the experts in what they do...I don't tell
them how to put patches on their systems. I say, `Here are the coverages and the gaps in
the coverages, this is what we need to protect.' If they think insurance is the end-all
and be-all, I have to tell them that it's not," she said.
When the IT and risk management departments work together to dovetail their strengths in
assessing technology risks, the organization has a strong loss control approach, Ms.
Dowdall suggested.
For a multihospital operation such as Tenet, managing all the intricacies of a complex
technology network is "way beyond my reach," Mr. Bragman said.
"Here, I have very little to do with IT," he noted. The level of expertise in
that department is "very sophisticated," he said, noting that his job is to make
sure that IT and risk management communicate and coordinate their approach to loss
control.
"With each corporation, it's a different mindset," said Mr. Foster of Marsh.
"The best model," he said, involves "putting together an e-risk team"
to identify and determine how to protect against cyber threats. Such a team should be made
up of risk management and technology professionals as well as members of the
organization's legal and human resources departments, business section leaders, internal
audit professionals and others.
Jan Wleugel, senior vp at Marsh in Toronto, said that "the first thing risk managers
should do is work with IT and senior executives to point out that this is both a
first-party and third-party risk." Risk managers who are able to become more involved
in managing IT risks are those who get endorsements from their chief executive officers
and chief financial officers, he noted.
That is accomplished, Mr. Wleugel said, in part by convincing senior management that the
costs associated with protecting the organization from cyber threats needs to be
considered part of the company's overall cost of risk. It also helps to make sure
management understands the potential loss to the organization from breach-of-privacy
actions if confidential customer information is left unguarded in a computer system, he
said.
There can be some philosophical battles between IT and risk management departments,
though, Mr. Wleugel acknowledged. "We have seen that happen. IT typically looks at
the risk and risk control measures such as firewalls and virus protection. They feel like
they have engineered 90% of the risk out and typically they would assume that the
remaining 10% is highly unlikely to occur."
That, Mr. Wleugel emphasized, "is a different approach than a risk manager would
take," as the risk manager would consider that the 10% "has the potential for a
catastrophic loss."
When risk managers are ready to cover cyber risks, they have a ready market that has
matured over the last few years, observers say. "My assessment is that the players
that were there three years ago are still the same," said Ms. Dowdall. "And we
know where they want to be now with their property and liability coverages."
Mr. Foster said insurers can provide capacity of up to $200 million for cyber risks to
protect against losses from viruses, hacking, corrupted data, data-recovery costs and
other exposures. Underwriters also are willing to cover the expenses related to cyber
extortion, he said, with insurance that pays the costs for responding to thieves who have
stolen computerized information. Reward amounts paid to recover the information are part
of the coverage.
© Copyright Business
Insurance 2003
|